In the first chapter of The
Innovation Formula for small business leaders and entrepreneurs,
Langdon Morris explained the importance of questions and maps that
describe competition, change, the future, innovation and strategy
that are intended to help you understand the significant forces that
are shaping business today, and to harness the ones that are already
shaping tomorrow. In the second chapter, we look at a third core
element that this book is organized around, which is the innovation
formula.
Yes, we do believe that there is a formula for success at
innovation, and we have found over the years that it doesn’t matter
whether you’re running a garage, a sandwich shop, or a
multinational auto manufacturer, success in each case relies on your
performance in the same five areas. Whether you’re the CEO of GM or
the chief cook and bottle washer, you have to think about the same
problems, study, learn, research, experiment, engage in some risk,
and manage it closely. How you do these, of course, is entirely
different depending on the size of your business, but nevertheless
the actual elements seem to be consistent across all businesses.
The formula consists of the six major topics: complexity and
change, risk, speed, engagement, leadership, and tools. Here is a
quick summary of the key ideas and the reasoning that you’ll find
throughout the rest of this serialized book.
Complexity and Change
The external environment is an unyielding and unceasing source of
change, and your organization must adapt to it if it’s going to
survive. Hence, complexity and change literally define the context in
which innovation and its close cousin, strategy, are relevant. It is
to external change that drives market needs and preferences, and
hence it is a critical role of leadership to be attuned to the
rhythm, character, and specifics of what is happening out there in
the increasingly wild world. The other critical role is of course
leading the process of responding to those changes.
Risk
When we understand what’s happening in the external environment
we can organize the pursuit of innovation, correctly targeted, so
that we produce the right innovations to meet current and future
market needs. But if only it were so easy. In fact, it is
intellectually and operationally challenging to figure out what’s
the right thing to do, the right products and services to create.
Furthermore, having a clear vision of the future products and
services is not at all the same as actually having them in hand.
Hence, there is a double risk. First, anticipating future needs
correctly is by no means an easy task. What if, for example, you see
clearly what the needs of the future will be, but in the end it turns
out that you’re wrong? This, of course, is the story of countless
failed companies, which aimed for a target in the future market that
the actual market itself never selected?
Second, even if you do get it right, there’s still the many
problems associated with developing the right products and services
to meet the anticipated needs. Can your designs and plans actually
work? Can you complete the development work in a timely way? Does
your organization have the internal talent and the right external
partners to master the many challenges?
Risk, then, is inherent in the
innovation
management problem, and it is inescapable. So the right amount of
risk is essentially the least possible risk.
“Least possible,” however, is trickier than it may at first
sound. Least, after all, is really none, but of course the point of
competition and change and all that is that taking no risk means
making no innovations at all, which is actually a very risky
approach, because it leaves you entirely vulnerable to those very
changes. Consequently, “least possible” really means the least
you can take on while still remaining viable, but even knowing
exactly how much risk that is, is actually unknowable.
And so the problem now becomes one of information, because you
probably don’t know what innovations your competitors are working
on, nor everything about the new and innovative technologies that may
be coming, etc., etc., which means that while you cannot afford to do
nothing, to just wait for the future to bury your business, you are
obliged to act, compelled to act, to act proactively yet with
incomplete information.
This is the character of the risks you must take. Taking them
well, thoughtfully, strategically is what’s necessary. Achieving
this, navigating through this difficult but fascinating landscape
will take some thought and a lot of effort.
Speed
Despite the many risks you plunge ahead, thoughtfully, to create
your organization’s future. You are now engaged in the depths of
the innovation process itself.
That process is not such an easy one, as it must be thorough and
thoughtful, of course, but above all it must be fast. Again, the
premise here is that your information is incomplete, and you just
don’t know how fast your competitors will move, nor do you know
exactly how the market will respond to their new ideas, nor to yours.
So the best way to deal with the compounding of uncertainty is to go
fast, to learn fast, to learn what works and what doesn’t work
through techniques such as agile sprints, rapid prototyping, minimum
viable products, a-b testing, and related techniques (which we will
discuss in chapter 5). We express this in the innovation formula as
speed, and of course there is a lot of value in getting solid results
fast, faster than your competitors.
Engagement
The next element of the formula relates to the culture of your
organization, for you and your partner are the ones who are going to
develop ideas, figure out which ones are great, and turn them into
something useful, test them, and bring the very best to the market.
Theoretically, you could find the smartest person in your
organization, set them to the innovation task, and achieve good or
even great results. Practically, though, the issues that have to be
dealt with are probably deeper and broader than a single individual
can master, because today’s innovation projects integrate knowledge
across multiple domains, each of which itself runs quite deep.
Hence, we know that innovation is not an individual activity, but
a team sport. The optimal innovation process is one in which your
organization is engaged, one in which all of the strengths, thoughts,
and talents of everyone, and also those of the broader ecosystem in
which your organization participates, are fully engaged.
Leadership
It’s also true of organizations that deep and thorough
engagement comes about only when there is superbly focused
leadership. We know that innovation can happen in organizations where
the risks are understood, and where the ambiguities and uncertainties
that are inherent in the process are known and acknowledged, and
where there is willingness to engage in the necessary levels of risk
taking.
We also know that in organizations where people are punished for
making intelligent mistakes, for thoughtfully trying new things that
fail, for thinking about how to do things better, and differently,
the spirit of innovation is swiftly and decisively stifled. Hence,
leaders must embrace and promote the critical elements which enable
an innovation culture to emerge, or it will not emerge.
Tools
The last clause of the formula concerns the tools and methods that
we use to manage the entire innovation effort. All other things being
equal, better tools and methods are likely to support better results,
and while this does not necessarily mean that you have to invest a
lot of money in new technology, you do need to think through
carefully and invest appropriately in methods, processes, and
organizational structures that enable and promote innovation efforts,
and which set the tone and context in which innovation can thrive.
So these are the six elements in the innovation formula; here they
are expressed in pseudo math:
(Complexity and Change) >
Innovation
Innovation = f (Risk) (Speed) (Engagement) (Leadership)
+ (Tools)
Or in English, Complexity and change means that Innovation is
essential for survival. Achieving innovation a function of Risk,
times Speed, times Engagement, times Leadership, plus Tools.
In previous books, I and co-authors have examined many aspects and
facets of this formula in considerable detail, and in our work with
enterprises large and small all around the world we’ve worked with
them to implement it, to make innovation real, important, and
effective for their organizations.
And as I mentioned above, we believe that exactly the same
innovation formula works for GM and Toyota as it does for the local
restaurant and the auto garage, and that it will probably work for
your small business too. So while nearly all of the nuances and
details or its implementation will certainly be different from the
Fortune 500 firm to the local business in Peru, China, New York, or
Auckland, we are convinced based on many years of practice that the
actual thinking process, that the critical questions and the guiding
maps, will be nearly the same.
This book is the fifth one in a series that explores all of this
in a lot detail. It was preceded by
Permanent Innovation,
The Innovation Master Plan,
The Chief Innovation
Officer, and
Agile Innovation, and you may be
interested in checking these out if you’re the sort of person who
likes to absorb a lot of detail and wants to study the deeper
reasoning.
If you’re not the person who wants to read a lot of detail, then
hopefully the concise contents of this book will help you to
understand the challenges, and design the right responses.
In each subsequent chapter we will explore the formula one element
at a time, beginning with a quick look at the broader context of
complexity and change, followed by the remaining five elements, with
a particular focus on what they mean for you, the small and medium
sized business leader or entrepreneur, and also with focus on action
and implementation.
This is not intended as theoretical exercise, but rather an
entirely practical guidebook. We hope it helps you to arrive at the
right destination, namely an innovative and thereby successful firm.